Isolation, Screening and Evaluation of Multifunctional
Strains of High Efficient Phosphate Solubilizing
Microbes from Rhizosphere Soil
Thiruvengadam. S1,
Ramki. R1, Rohini. S1*, Vanitha. R1, Ivo
Romauld2
1Department
of Biotechnology, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Chennai-602105, TN, India
2Department of Bio-Engineering, VISTAS,
Chennai - 600117, Tamil Nadu, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: rohinisampath.bt@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Phosphorus is one of the essential macronutrients which supports
plant growth and is obtained from the soil. Phosphate solubilizing
micro-organisms helps in solubilizing the insoluble form of phosphates into
soluble forms. The present study is aimed to isolate phosphate solubilizing
microorganisms from rhizosphere of four plants. P-solubilizing organisms were
screened using the Pikovskaya’s medium with
Tricalcium phosphate as the sole source of phosphate. P-solubilization activity
was measured in NBRIP medium and two fungal and bacterial strains obtained from
the Colocasia esculenta were selected
for their maximum solubilization indices. The selected strains were subjected
for morphological, biochemical and genotypic identification and the strains
were identified to be Pestalotiopsis microspora, Aquabacterium
commune, Bacillus spp., and Aspergillus spp. All the
identified strains were subjected to screening against various environmental
stresses such as salinity, pH and temperatures. The strains were also tested
for intrinsic antibiotic resistance. Finally, the strains were tested for the
pesticide tolerance activity against 0.25% Cypermethrin. From
these tests, it was observed that the strains were tolerant to salt
concentration upto 4%, to temperature upto 37ᵒC. and to pH of 7.8. The strains were tested
for the indole acetic acid production activity and were found to be positive
for the test. The strains were found to resistant against all the antibiotics
except Gentamicin and Co-Trimoxazole. It was also found that the strains were
tolerant towards the 0.25% Cypermethrin upto 1g/L. The identified strains were further
analyzed by the molecular studies and constructed phylogenetic tree analysis.
KEYWORDS: Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms,
Rhizosphere, NBRIP medium, Indole acetic acid, Pesticide tolerance.
INTRODUCTION:
Phosphorus is a second most needed major plant nutrients
limiting the growth and yield1,2. It plays many structural and
physiological functions in the plants3 and its deficiency leads to
the stunted growth in plants. Plants can utilize the soluble forms of phosphate
from the soil which is present in low quantities. Hence chemical phosphatic
fertilizers are used in the farm lands which are identified to be harmful to
environment4. Moreover, a great proportion of the phosphorus in
chemical fertilizer becomes unavailable in plants after its application in the
soil5,6.
Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms
(PSM) play an important role in phosphorus cycle7. The organisms can
convert insoluble phosphates into soluble forms8. The common
phosphate solubilizing micro-organisms include the Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and
Enterobacter bacterial species and Penicillium, Aspergillus of
fungal species9. The phosphate solubilizing activity of these
organisms is due to the secretion of low molecular weight acids such as citric
acid, gluconic acid, 2-keto gluconic acid and oxalic acid, which via their
hydroxyl and carboxyl group chelate the cations bound to the phosphate and
convert it into soluble forms10. Other than phosphate
solubilization, these organisms have also been identified to be stress tolerant
and. These microbes can be used as inoculants to improve the soil growth and
yield. Hence biofertilizers based on the phosphate solubilizing organisms are
gaining an extensive interest of the agriculturists and the researchers. The
aim of this work is to isolate and identify phosphate solubilizing micro-organisms
from the rhizospheric soil of different plants. The
phosphate solubilizing activity is to be calculated for the isolated strains.
The selected strains are to be tested for tolerance against varying conditions
of salt concentrations, pH and temperature. The antibiotic resistance activity
and pesticide tolerance activity of the selected micro-organisms is also to be
characterized.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Sample collection:
Soil samples were collected from
rhizosphere soil of different economical crops. The crops include Arachis hypogaea (Groundnut), Solanum lycopersicum
(Tomato), Vicia faba
(Broad beans) and Colocasia esculenta
(Taro root). The plants were selected on their commercial usability and the
soil samples (Rhizophere) were collected at Mazhavanthangal, Villupuram District, TN, India.
Isolation of Phosphate Solubilizing
Micro-organisms:
The collected soil samples were serially
diluted into different concentrations and placed on Pikovskaya’s
(PVK) medium with Tri Calcium Phosphate (TCP) as the sole source of phosphate11.
The medium is prepared with the ingredients manually and the pH of the medium
was adjusted to 7.0 before autoclaving. The serially diluted soil sample
solutions were spread on the Pikovskaya’s agar plates
and were incubated at room temperature. After 3 days of incubation the plates
were observed for the clear zones that indicates the presence of P-solubilizing
organisms.
Confirmation of Phosphate Solubilizing
Micro-organisms:
The confirmation of P-solubilizing
micro-organism was done by plating the isolated microbial colonies in NBRIP
(National Botanical Research Institute’s Phosphate) medium with Tri Calcium
Phosphate acting as the sole source of phosphate. The plates were incubated at
room temperature. After 3 days of incubation, the colonies were observed for
clear halo zones which confirm the phosphate solubilization activity of the
organisms. The zones were measured for calculating the phosphate
solubilization. The activity of P-solubilizing microbes was measured by using
phosphate solubilization index formula12. Higher the phosphate
solubilization index, higher the phosphate solubilization activity.
Phosphate Solubilizing Index = Total
Diameter/ Diameter of the colony
Morphological Identification:
After the confirmation of the microbes for
the P-solubilization activity, the strains were primarily identified by
morphological observation. The Phosphate solubilizing fungi (PSF) were observed
by Lactophenol Cotton Blue staining and the bacteria (PSB) were identified by
Gram's staining and biochemical tests.
Environmental Tolerance tests:
Salt Tolerance test:
The PSB was plated on Nutrient Agar (NA)
prepared with different salt concentrations of 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2gL-1 NaCl.
Likewise PSF was also plated on Sabaouraud
Dextrose Agar (SDA)13 and incubated at 28ºC for a period of 24 hours
– 4days.
pH Tolerance test:
The PSB was streaked on Nutrient Agar (NA)
plates prepared with varying pH of 4.8, 5.8, 6.8 and 8.8. Likewise
PSF was also plated on Sabaouraud Dextrose Agar
(SDA). The pH was adjusted with NaOH and HCl. The plates were incubated for 24
hours – 24 days at 28ºC14.
Temperature Tolerance test:
The PSB was streaked on Nutrient Agar (NA)
plates and PSF was streaked on Sabaouraud Dextrose
Agar (SDA) plates. Four plates were prepared for each selected strains and incubated at the temperatures of 10, 20, 28 and
38oC respectively for 24 hours - 4 days.
Intrinsic Antibiotic Resistance test:
The bacterial culture was spread out on
the MHA (Muller Hinton Agar) plates. The plates contained 9 different
antibiotic discs and were incubated for 24 hours at 28ºC. The zone of
inhibition or resistance was observed and recorded.
Pesticide Tolerance activity:
The PSB strains were streaked on Nutrient
Agar (NA) plates and PSF was streaked on Sabaouraud
Dextrose Agar (SDA) plates containing varying concentrations of 0.25%
Cypermethrin such as 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 gL-1. The plates were
kept in incubation for 24 hours to 4 days at 28ºC15 and growth was
observed.
Gene Sequencing:
The identification
of strains done by the gene sequencing. The gene sequencing was done by the ‘Yaazh Xenomics’, Coimbatore. The
fungal strain was sequenced by 18s RNA sequencing and the bacterial strain by
the 16s rRNA sequencing. Based on the results, phylogenetic trees were
constructed 16.
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSIONS:
In this present study, phosphate
solubilizing microorganisms were isolated from rhizospheric
soil based on the screening technique. Phosphate solubilization activity,
Environmental tolerance, Indole Acetic Acid production activity and Pesticide
tolerance activity were also determined.
Isolation of PSM:
For isolation of phosphate solubilizing
microorganisms, rhizosphere soil collected from the plants of Arachis hypogaea (Groundnut), Solanum lycopersicum
(Tomato), Vicia faba
(Broad beans) and Colocasia esculenta
(Taro root) the colonies were isolated in Pikovskaya’s
medium. The colonies with the zones are primarily identified to be of both
fungal and bacterial organisms (Table 1). Among the plants, the soil samples
obtained from Colocasia esculenta resulted
in more number of colonies compared to the other crop
plants.
Table 1: Number of colonies obtained after
initial screening
|
S. No. |
Samples |
No. of bacterial colonies |
No. of fungal colonies |
|
1 |
Arachis hypogaea |
3 |
2 |
|
2 |
Solanum lycopersicum |
2 |
4 |
|
3 |
Vicia faba |
4 |
3 |
|
4 |
Colocasia esculenta |
5 |
6 |
Confirmation
of PSM:
The
colonies with the clear halo zones around the colonies were confirmed to be
P-solubilizing organisms. From the 29 colonies obtained in the initial
screening, 16 colonies were confirmed to be P-solubilizing organisms. Among
those, four strains were observed for high solubilization indices. The strain
CF1 obtained from the Colocasia esculenta
(Taro root) (Fig. 1) showed highest phosphate solubilization index (Table 2).
Table 2.
Four efficient strains of phosphate solubilizing organisms with higher
solubilization indices
|
S. No. |
Source |
Strains |
Phosphate Solubilization Index |
|
1 |
Colocosia esculenta |
CF1 (Fungal) |
3.84 |
|
2 |
Colocosia esculenta |
CF2 (Fungal) |
2.85 |
|
3 |
Colocosia esculenta |
CB3 (Bacterial) |
2.00 |
|
4 |
Colocosia esculenta |
CB4 (Bacterial) |
1.25 |
Morphological Identification:
The selected strains based on their
ability was morphologically identified. The strain CF2 was identified as Aspergillus
spp. The selected bacterial strain CB3 was observed as blue coloured
rod shaped Gram negative colonies and the strain CB4
was observed as Gram positive pink coloured rods
arranged in chains (bamboo stick appearance) and identified as Bacillus
spp.
Environmental Tolerance tests:
Salt Tolerance test:
All the strains showed tolerance against
different concentrations of NaCl. Among the strains, only the fungal strain CF2
showed moderate tolerance towards the different salt concentrations. This shows
that the strains were capable of surviving in soils with different amount of
salts
pH Tolerance test:
All the strains showed tolerance against pH.
Among the strains, only the fungal strain CF1 showed no tolerance towards the
pH values of 4.8 and 5.8. This shows that the strains were capable of surviving
in soils with different pH values.
Temperature Tolerance test:
The plates incubated for different temperatures were observed
after 24 hours for tolerance against thermal stress. All the strains showed
tolerance against the different temperatures. Among the strains, only the
fungal strain CF1 showed no tolerance at temperatures of 10 and 20ºC.
Intrinsic Antibiotic Resistance test:
The plates that were incubated with nine different types of
antibiotics for 24 hours were observed for their antibiotics
resistance. All the bacterial strains were resistant for the antibiotics other
than Gentamicin and Co-Trimoxazole (Fig. 2).
Pesticide Tolerance activity:
All the strains showed tolerance against
different concentrations of 0.25% Cypermethrin. Among the strains, only the
fungal strain CF2 showed low tolerance towards the higher concentrations of
0.75 and 1.0gL-1 (Table 3). This strain showed variation in
tolerance according to the pesticide concentrations. The bacterial strains CB3
and CF4 showed growth in all concentrations and have higher tolerance towards
the pesticide. This shows that the strains were capable of surviving in soils
with different amount of pesticide concentrations.
Table 3. Pesticidal resistance activity
different strains
|
S. No |
Pesticide concentration (gL-1) |
Fungal strains |
Bacterial strains |
||
|
Strain CF1 |
Strain CF2 |
Strain CB3 |
Strain CB4 |
||
|
1
|
0.22 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
2 |
0.5 |
+ |
± |
+ |
+ |
|
3 |
0.75 |
± |
± |
+ |
+ |
|
4 |
1.0 |
± |
- |
+ |
+ |
* Note: (+: growth, ±: low growth, -: no growth)
Gene Sequencing:
The sequence obtained from the fungal strain was compared with the
data available in NCBI using BLAST algorithm and the strain was identified to
be Pestalotiopsis microspora.
Likewise the sequence of the bacterial strain was
identified to be Aquabacterium commune.
CONCLUSION:
Among the soil
samples collected, Colocasia esculenta
showed phosphate solubilizing strains (two fungal and two bacterial strains)
with higher efficiency. From the morphological and genotypic identification
study, the CF1 and CB3 strains were concluded that Pestalotiopsis
microspora and Aquabacterium
commune respectively. The CF2 and CB4 strains were identified form
morphologically identified as Aspergillus spp. and Bacillus spp.
From the environmental tests, it was observed that the strains were tolerant to
salt concentration upto 4%, to temperature upto 37ᵒC. and to pH of 7.8. The strains were found
to resistant against all the antibiotics except Gentamicin and Co-Trimoxazole.
It was also found that the strains were tolerant towards the 0.25% Cypermethrin
upto 1g/L. Therefore, it can be concluded that the
strains obtained from the study are efficient as well as multi-functional. The conventionally used biofertilizers are
mostly derived from the strains of Phosphobacteria.
From this study, it can be also concluded that the obtained strains are
efficient than the already existing biofertilizers. Hence, the identified
strains can be further used in mass producing the carrier
based inoculums for biofertilizers in future.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors wish to acknowledge to the Department of
Biotechnology, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Thandalam,
Chennai, TN, India for allowing us to use all facilities for our research work,
and their constant encouragement and support.
REFERENCES:
1. Sharpley
NA. Soil phosphorus dynamics: agronomics and environmental impacts. Ecological
Engineering. 1995; 5(3): 261-279.
2. Nautiyal. C. Shekar (1999). ‘An efficient
microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing
microorganisms’, FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1999; 170(1):265–270.
3. Schachtman PD, Robert JR and SM Ayling.
Phosphorus Uptake by Plants: From Soil to Cell. Plant Physiology.1998; 116(2):
447-453.
4. Khan M,
Zaidi A and Wani P. Role of phosphate solubilizing
microorganisms in sustainable agriculture - A review. Agronomy for Sustainable
Development. 2007; 27(1): 29-43.
5. Arpana, Vikram Bharati, Kumar SD, Shushma,
Prasad TN. Effect of seed inoculation, fertility and irrigation on
uptake of major nutrients and soil fertility status after harvest of latesss sown lentil. Journal of Applied Biology. 2002;
12(1/2): 23-26.
6. Mehrvarz S, Chaichi MR
and Alikhani HA. Effects of Phoshphate
solubilizing microorganisms and phosphorous chemical fertilizer on yield and
yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare
L.). American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 2008; 3(6): 822-828.
7. Amia
Ekka, Anju Verma and Monika Verma. Impact of Phosphate Solubilizing Fungi of
Different Habitats on Plant Growth -A Review. Research J. Science and Tech.
2015; 7(3): 141-145.
8. Sun Chul Kang, Chul Gyu Ha, Tae Geun Lee and Maheshwari DK. Solubilization of insoluble
inorganic phosphates by a soil-inhabiting fungus Fomitopsis
sp. PS 102. Current Science. 2002; 82(4): 439-442.
9. Rodriguez H and Fraga R (1999). Phosphate
solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology
Advances. 1999; 17(4-5): 319-339.
10. Kannahi M and Umaragini
N. Isolation, characterization and antagonistic effect of phosphate
solubilizing microorganisms from Vigna radiate L. Rhizospheric
soil. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2013;
2(5): 83-88.
11. Singh S and Kapoor KK. Inoculation with
phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms and a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungus improves dry matter yield and nutrient uptake by wheat grown in a sandy
soil. Biology and fertility of soils. 1999; 28(2): 139-144.
12. Nautiyal CS. An efficient microbiological growth
medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology
Letters. 1999; 170(1): 265–270.
13. Ben Romdhane S, Nasr
H, Samba‐Mbaye R, Neyra M, Ghorbal MH and De Lajudie P. Genetic diversity of Acacia tortilis spp. Raddiana
rhizobia in Tunisia assessed by 16s and16s-23s rDNA genes analysis. Journal
of Applied Microbiology. 2006; 100(3): 436 - 445.
14. Abderrazak Rfaki, Laila Nassiri and Jamal Ibijbijen.
Genetic diversity and phosphate solubilizing ability of Triticum aestivum rhizobacteria isolated from Meknes region,
Morocco. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2014; 8(19): 1931-1938.
15. Shadab Alam, Adesh Kumar, Arun Kumar et al. Isolation and
Characterization of Pesticide Tolerant Bacteria from Brinjal Rhizosphere.
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018; 7:
4849-4859.
16. Arindam Adhikari, Suvodip
Nandi, Indrabrata Bhattacharya, Mithu
De Roy, Tanusri Mandal and Subrata Dutta3.
Phylogenetic analysis based evolutionary study of 16S rRNA in known Pseudomonas
sp. Bioinformation 2015; 11(10): 474–480.
Received on 23.04.2019
Modified on 11.06.2019
Accepted on 28.10.2019
© RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm.
and Tech. 2020; 13(4):1823-1826.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00328.5